An enhanced terminal guidance law for short-range aerial vehicles with impact angle constraints and aerodynamic uncertainty
9 viewsDOI:
https://doi.org/10.54939/1859-1043.j.mst.FMC.2026.133-141Keywords:
Aerodynamic uncertainty; Bezier curves; Impact angle; Onboard guidance; Terminal guidance; Trajectory regeneration.Abstract
In terminal guidance for short-range aerial vehicles, especially in scenarios involving attacks on maritime targets, ensuring the required approach angle is a decisive factor in mission effectiveness. The same vehicle can be significantly more effective when approaching the target at the correct angle than when merely reaching the correct position without satisfying the desired approach-angle condition. However, this requirement is difficult to fulfill in practice because of the combined effects of continuously varying sea-surface winds and aerodynamic uncertainties when the vehicle operates in low-dynamic-pressure conditions near the sea surface. This paper proposes a terminal guidance law for short-range aerial vehicles employing a skid-to-turn control configuration, in which the approach trajectory is regenerated at each guidance cycle in the form of a second- or third-order Bézier curve, while simultaneously satisfying both positional and angular constraints at the terminal point. Based on this reference trajectory, the required velocity-direction rates are transformed into commands for the angle of attack, α, and the sideslip angle, β, through a closed-form dynamic-inversion step. Monte Carlo simulation results obtained using the reference model show that the proposed method achieves a circular error probable of less than 1 m and a terminal flight-path-angle error of less than 1.5 degrees, while maintaining robustness against uncertainties in wind, atmospheric density, and aerodynamic coefficients.
References
[1]. P. Zarchan, “Tactical and Strategic Missile Guidance”, 6th ed., AIAA, Reston, VA, USA, (2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/4.868948
[2]. N. A. Shneydor, “Missile Guidance and Pursuit: Kinematics, Dynamics and Control”, Horwood, Chichester, U.K., (1998). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1533/9781782420590
[3]. S. Chen, W. Wang, J. Fan et al., “Impact angle constraint guidance law using fully-actuated system approach”, Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 136, p. 108220, (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2023.108220
[4]. X. Kong, C. Zhang and F. Xiong, “Impact speed and angle constrained guidance law for unpowered gliding vehicle”, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 38, No. 4, (2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.08.027
[5]. Y. Li, J. Liu, J. Shan and J. Wang, “Guidance law with terminal velocity constraint for hypersonic morphing vehicle”, Advances in Guidance, Navigation and Control (ICGNC 2024), Springer, Singapore, (2025).
[6]. A. Li, X. Hu, S. Yang and K. Dong, “Adaptive terminal time and impact angle constraint cooperative guidance strategy for multiple vehicles”, Drones, Vol. 8, No. 4, p. 134, (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8040134
[7]. Y. He, F. Guo, H. Zhang and S. Chen, “Pre-defined time convergent non-singular terminal sliding mode guidance law with impact angle constraint”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, (2025).
[8]. Z. Hu, W. Yi and L. Xiao, “Deep reinforcement learning-based impact angle-constrained adaptive guidance law”, Mathematics, Vol. 13, No. 6, p. 987, (2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math13060987
[9]. L. Liang, B. Zhao, J. Zhou and Z. Zhang, “Impact angle controlled integrated guidance and control with input and state constraints”, International Journal of Control, Vol. 97, No. 4, pp. 796–810, (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2023.2175408
[10]. J. Guo, Y. Zhou and M. Zhou, “Adaptive control law based integrated guidance and control design for missile with the radome error compensation”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 238, No. 4, pp. 361–371, (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09544100231224071
[11]. P. Kumar, G. Joseph, C. R. Murthy and R. Padhi, “Comprehensive MPSP for fast optimal control: Algorithm development and convergence analysis”, Transactions of the Indian National Academy of Engineering, Vol. 10, pp. 33–52, (2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41403-024-00502-6
[12]. Y.-Z. Wang and H.-H. Dai, “Secure model predictive static programming with initial value generator for online computational guidance of near-space vehicles”, Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 156, p. 109768, (2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.109768
[13]. H. Shi, Z. Cheng, M. Kuang, J. Zhu, X. Yan and X. Li, “Four-stage guidance law for impact time and angle control based on the Bezier curve”, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 3766–3778, (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2023.3334265
[14]. S. Coskun, A. Catak and E. Koyuncu, “3D impact time and angle control based on Apollo guidance and Bezier curves”, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, (2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2025-0534
[15]. W. Chen, P. Sui, Y. Qian et al., “Cubic Bézier shaping impact angle constrained guidance for intercepting maneuvering targets”, Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 114, No. 3, Art. No. 192, (2026). DOI: 10.1007/s11071-025-12057-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-025-12057-4
