Integrated Probabilistic Engagement Modeling and Guidance Accuracy Optimization for Launch and Lethal Zone Construction
9 viewsDOI:
https://doi.org/10.54939/1859-1043.j.mst.112.2026.38-46Keywords:
Launch zone; Lethal zone; Probability of kill; Missile simulation; Weapon effectiveness.Abstract
This paper develops a unified probabilistic framework for missile–target engagement assessment integrating kinematic reachability, fragment-based lethality modeling, and stochastic terminal guidance uncertainty. Closed-form approximations for expected kill probability are derived under Rayleigh-distributed miss distance. Analytical asymptotic analysis reveals an exponential dependence of engagement effectiveness on inverse-squared guidance accuracy. A deterministic lethal-radius model is compared with the proposed probabilistic formulation, demonstrating significant overestimation by traditional methods. An optimization problem is formulated to determine the minimum required terminal guidance accuracy ensuring a prescribed kill probability threshold. The results provide quantitative design constraints for guidance and control system development.
References
[1]. Zarchan, Paul. “Tactical and strategic missile guidance”. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., (2012).
[2]. Lloyd, Richard. “Conventional warhead systems physics and engineering design”. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., (1998).
[3]. Moon, Sei-Hoon. “Weapon effectiveness and the shapes of damage functions”. Defence technology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 617-632, (2021).
[4]. Gao, Bo, Li-Jun Qiu, and Yue-Ting Yao. “Research on kill probability for single air-defense missile”. Dandao Xuebao(Journal of Ballistics), vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 52-55, (2011).
[5]. Shneydor, Neryahu A. “Missile guidance and pursuit: kinematics, dynamics and control”. Elsevier, (1998).
[6]. Ha, Le Hai, Nguyen Quang Vinh, and Nguyen Tang Cuong. “Dynamics of Self-guided Rocket Control with the optimal Angle Coordinate System Combined with Measuring Target Parameters for Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave Radar”. Intelligent Computing in Engineering: Select Proceedings of RICE 2019. Singapore: Springer Singapore, pp. 951-962, (2020).
[7]. Dantas, Joao PA, et al. “PoKER: a probability of kill estimation rate model for air-to-air missiles using machine learning on stochastic targets”. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, (2025). DOI: 10.1177/15485129241309675.
[8]. Gyue-jeong, Lee, Yong-hwan Kim, and Daeyoung Choi. “Predictive Factor Analysis of Air-to-Air Engagement Outcomes Using Air Combat Manoeuvring Instrumentation Data”. Defence Science Journal, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 35-43, (2025).
[9]. Adams, Stephen, et al. “Probabilistic Models for Military Kill Chains”. Systems, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 924, (2025).
[10]. Schneider, Marc, and Walter Fichter. “Many-vs-Many Missile Guidance via Virtual Targets”. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.02526, (2025).
[11]. Mudrik, Liraz, and Yaakov Oshman. “Bang-Bang Evasion: Its Stochastic Optimality and a Terminal-Set-Based Implementation”. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21633, (2025).
