ASSESSMENT OF TARGET DETECTION ABILITY FOR LASER FUZES IN FOG CONDITIONS
656 viewsDOI:
https://doi.org/10.54939/1859-1043.j.mst.75A.2021.8-16Keywords:
Laser fuze; Laser wavelenght; Asmospheric attenuation.Abstract
The article presents a method to evaluate the target detection efficiency of laser fuzes operating in foggy conditions. The evaluation model is built from: the distance equation of the laser system, the attenuation of the beam in two-way propagation, the disturbances affecting the system; the signal to noise ratio SRN has determined the detection probability of the receiver. The model was used to evaluate with wavelengths: 850 nm, 1000 nm and 1550 nm, when propagating in three different bad weather conditions. The results show that the most effective detection of the target when using a wavelength of 1550 nm in visibility in haze and mist conditions (visibility V > 500 m). In fog conditions (visibility V < 500 m), the above three wavelengths provide the same detection efficiency. The article provides the method and instructions for choosing the wavelength of the laser fuze.
References
[1]. T. J. Hu, Y. L. Zhao, Y. Zhao, and W. Ren, “Integration design of a MEMS based fuze,” Sens. Actuat. A 268, 193–200 (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2017.09.051
[2]. Y. J. Tang, Z. Yang, X. J. Wang, and J. Wang, “Research on the piezo- electric ultrasonic actuator applied to smart fuze safety system,” Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech. 53, (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JAE-160044
[3]. F. Q. Liu, “Quantum cascade lasers: from mid-infrared to THz,” Opt. Optoelectron. Technol. 15, 1–5 (2017).
[4]. W. Zhang, Y. L. Li, and Z. H. Huang, “Research on the characteristics of fog backscattering signals for frequency modulated continuous wave laser fuze,” Optik 127, 9046–9055 (2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.06.129
[5]. F. J. Wang, H. M. Chen, C. Ma, and L. X. Xu, “Construction of back- scattering echo caused by cloud in laser fuze,” Optik 171, 153–160 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.06.028
[6]. D. M. Winker and L. R. Poole, “Monte-Carlo calculations of cloud returns for ground-based and space-based LIDARS,” Appl. Phys. B 60, 341–344 (1995). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01082269
[7]. V. Srivastava, M. A. Jarzembski, and D. A. Bowdle, “Comparison of calculated aerosol backscatter at 9.1- and 2.1-μm wavelengths,” Appl. Opt. 31, 1904–1906 (1992). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.31.001904
[8]. R. Richmond and S. Cain, “Direct-Detection LADAR Systems”, (SPIE Press, 2010) 124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/3.836466
[9]. H.Weichel, “Laser Beam Propagation in the Atmosphere”, SPIE, Belingham WA,190.
[10]. W.E.K.Midleton, “Vision Through the Atmosphere”, U.of Toronto Pres, Toronto, 1952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487586140
[11]. Broome, K.W., Carstens, A.M., Hudson, J.R. and Yates, K.L., “Demonstration of advanced solid state ladar,” Proc. SPIE 3065, 148-157 (1997). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.281004
[12]. Isaac, I. K., Bruce, M. and Eric, K., “Comparison of laser beam propagation at 785 nm and 1550 nm in fog and haze for optical wireless communications,” Proc. SPIE 4214, 26-37 (2001). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.417512
[13]. Eric, B., “LADAR proximity fuze-system study”, Masters Thesis, School of Electrical Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Sweden, 14-15 (2007).
[14]. Tomas, C., Ove, S.and Dietmar, L., “Signature simulation and signal analysis for 3-D laser radar”, Tech. Report, Swedish Defense Research Agency (FOI), Linköping, 22-23 (2001).
